Template talk:Infobox game

Oh man, we just totally do not need any more pictures in the infoboxes. Boxart for one version is fine, and logos can go on the series pages. ): The infoboxes are just supposed to give a summary, and usually they are not supposed to be filled with giant box images and push aside all of the text on the screen. ): Baaad.

Also, I think that we could do without some of the headings in this template... I know it came from Wikipedia and Wikipedia is surely right, but they also have about a million games to talk about and we have 5. <_< We could get rid of edition, media and mode at least since they're extremely minor and I'm pretty sure nobody actually knows what mode is supposed to mean, anyway... >__> Relevent and compact information always looks more professional! D: Kimbles 19:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Lol... okay. Haha. For the logo I suppose it could go in the top below the name, in a smaller one. Argh I dunno. But I really feel we should put the logo in. And how about putting both boxarts side by side, both smaller, so it can fit into the infobox? I'll go remove the extra headings first. ~Milnivri~ 12:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh wait. Why remove edition? ~Milnivri~ 12:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Because all of the games that are sequels already have 2 in the title, so it's kind of pointless. ^^; Kimbles

Um I actually need it for another thing in there, that's why the code for version is so complicated. I think I'll just don't display it. :/ ~Milnivri~ 14:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Composer

I think there should be a field for the composer. I think that's an important part of any game, and Wikipedia has one for their video game template. What do you all think? Blaziken257 20:39, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

If we did that, I'd feel it wouldn't be fair to other staff, which also worked hard on the game ): We can always make a Credits section. --Sanky ~ talk 06:03, September 20, 2009 (UTC)