Talk:Coronet (Aquatic): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Blaziken257 (talk | contribs) (Reform vs. Mod?) |
Blaziken257 (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Coronet (Reform-1) moved to Talk:Coronet (Aquatic): .) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Shouldn't this article be named to "Coronet (Mod-1)" or something like that? [[User:Blaziken257|Blaziken257]] 18:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC) | Shouldn't this article be named to "Coronet (Mod-1)" or something like that? [[User:Blaziken257|Blaziken257]] 18:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Redundant header... == | |||
It says this twice on the top: | |||
"For the evolutions of Coronet with the same name, see the evolution section of this article." | |||
Why does it say it twice? | |||
Why does it say it twice? [[User:Blaziken257|Blaziken257]] 21:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Oh, that's because I put the header into the infobox template. So there was no need to put the header again. :) <font color="black">[[User talk:Milnivri|~]]</font><font face="Calibri">[[User:Milnivri|Milnivri]]</font><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/Milnivri|~]]</font> 02:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:36, 21 September 2008
Reform vs. Mod?[edit]
Shouldn't this article be named to "Coronet (Mod-1)" or something like that? Blaziken257 18:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Redundant header...[edit]
It says this twice on the top:
"For the evolutions of Coronet with the same name, see the evolution section of this article."
Why does it say it twice?
Why does it say it twice? Blaziken257 21:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)