Talk:List of Denjuu in Telefang 1
Hrm, any way you can use the V template and still have a space between the icons? D: I thought they looked better that way... Kimbles 00:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Denjuu types
Now that we established what the real names of all the types are, should we go ahead and change them all? Or just keep them?
Actually, come to think of it, are they even called types? I get used to Pokémon terminology a lot... Blaziken257 18:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- You mean evolutionary stages? Like NatMon → Natural Denjuu? Yeah, go ahead. :) ~Milnivri~ 03:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I meant Lake/Sand/Land/Hill/Sky/Wood... Blaziken257 19:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's right. XD It says taipu (type) in katakana right on the stats screen. Habitat type is probably the best term for it, but type should work just fine in most cases. XD
Hm....Is there any way to make the habitat icons work as links to their respective pages? Like, clicking the forest icon takes you to the forest page. D: For me right now, the grassland icon and text take up 2 lines and make the whole list kind of screwy... It would look a lot neater with just the icons, too, since the text all centers differently here. *shrug* Kimbles 20:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Translations
Hmm I'm doing this for Kimbles' sake.. Please do not edit the names without giving a good reason. Kimbles has been hard at work translating the names, based on lots of research on the genuses of plants, and those left blank are those confusing ones, where either no genus/species name exists to justify the reason for the name.
So sorry to all those who contributed those few name changes/additions, but if you have done your research, do state them here and I guess it would be fine. :)
Thanks. I don't want this to turn into an edit war. ~Milnivri~ 10:52, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
Bootleg names
Could we perhaps move the bootleg name column next to the Denjuu stage so all the "proper" names were together? It's just my opinion, but I personally think that would look a little better aesthetically. I could easily do it with a regex, too, if anyone agreed with me. — TAKUMI 巧 (talk) 10:44, 19 June 2011 (MDT)